加入会员时，要获得一个受欢迎的盲盒？法院：不公平竞争的形成

为消费者购买盲箱是否违反？最近，广州互联网法院透露了一个由盲箱造成的不公平竞争案件，并裁定被告广州陶（因此从因此被称为个人公司）支付了原告北京Paulo公司（从这里到Paulo Company）。该案表明，Pao是“小穆琼”系列盲盒的制造商和运营商。 The PAO company reported that the company used the PAO name, the name of the "Xiao Moujun" product, the image of the blind box on the online store it runs, as well as promotion slogans such as "joining the membership and let 'Xiao Moujun' spend you" and "the Paulo Company believes that the aforementioned behavior has violated the play networks of the pictures involved inCase, and at the same time consumers made the mistake of believing that the两党共同合作，形成了不公平的竞争，因此他们向法院提起诉讼命令人类公司支付200万元。 TAO公司认为，案件中涉及的盲箱产品是从正式渠道购买的，PAO公司，PAO公司商标和正确资源的身份清楚地标记了礼物显示信息。它不会与PAO公司的商标和版权滥用或争吵，这不会使消费者感到困惑。审判后，法院裁定，该公司未经PAO公司许可使用案件中涉及的照片，PAO公司违反了PAO公司享受此案艺术活动的信息的网络传播权。同时，根据MGA的“中华人民共和国反对竞争法”的规定，确定被告违法行为是否构成令人困惑的行为的重点是，偶然的对象是否是具有一定效果的身份，如果被告的代理是“未经授权的使用”，以及是否重复行动的罪恶导致两个部分之间放弃了一定的联系。在这种情况下，Booni和“小Moujun”的盲盒具有市场认可和知名度，并且具有一定的影响力。 A person's company uses the promotional slogan "Win Pop 'Xiao Moujun' to accompany you through the double '12' member activities, and promotional behavior such as changing product name to" pop family portrait package ", which exceeds the scope of gifts and lottery, which is easywho believes that the two parties have a joint brand, and has a misconception of "confusion" "attachment", which generates an unfair competition time, "fake joint" marketing such as “名望骑”，“围绕品牌”和“自由骑行”增加了太阳 - 涉及与商标一样多的韧带风险，商标的商标，商标商标，版权侵蚀和不公平的竞争者liu yao yao yao yao yao yao yao